To my liking, Obama has appointed many, if not conservative, centrist figures. Probably not the change most dems wanted, but that's what they get for voting for some who rarely voted while in office.
What's more curious is how Obama managed to run on a 'change-crusade-like platform' with no political reform to show for it, and even more curiously, that nobody in the media noticed.If there's anything that the Gov. Blago scandal highlights, it's the scumminess of Chicago politics.
Famed Lieutenant General Lewis "Chesty" Puller once said, " We're surrounded. That simplifies the problem! ... Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away this time!"
Why, with so much corruption, did Obama, "the politics reformer," sit idle? He literally could've fought in any direction and would've been fighting some type of corruption with such rampant dirtiness in all directions.
Posts
1 comment:
Obama had no interest in fighting corruption. He has always been rather comfortable around "questionable" people. If those people could help him to get where he wanted to go, he could look the other way. He had one self serving thing on his mind, and that was how do I get to the next level. In Barack's mind there is only one truly important thing, and that is...Barack
Post a Comment